# 2022.11.08 Weekly Meeting

**URL:** <https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2022-11-08-weekly-meeting/26119>\
**Category:** Weekly meetings\
**Created:** [November 7, 2022, 10:14pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2022-11-08-weekly-meeting/26119 "2022-11-07T22:14:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Horvath](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.slicer.org/sam_horvath/32/3092_2.png) [@Sam\_Horvath](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/Sam_Horvath)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2022, 10:14pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2022-11-08-weekly-meeting/26119/1 "2022-11-07T22:14:43Z")

</div>

Tomorrow, we will be having our next weekly hangout at 10:00 AM ET until 11:00 AM ET.

Anyone is welcome to join to ask questions at [https://bit.ly/slicer-googlemeet-hosted-by-kitware](https://bit.ly/slicer-googlemeet-hosted-by-kitware)

Agenda:

- [Extension dashboard status](https://slicer.cdash.org/index.php?project=SlicerPreview#!#Extensions-Nightly)
- [5.2 Release Notes](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zPkAXym6_PDB1bBwekV3zGFYAs1viRQyJ2lSrP4B4DE/edit?usp=sharing)
- Thoughts on parameter node wrappings

Please post to this thread to put a topic on the agenda! We will try to prioritize agenda items during the meeting.

Thanks  
Sam and J-Christophe

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jamesobutler](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.slicer.org/jamesobutler/32/7511_2.png) [@jamesobutler](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/jamesobutler)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2022, 11:04pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2022-11-08-weekly-meeting/26119/2 "2022-11-07T23:04:41Z")

</div>

A MITK developer has started to make CTK compatible with Qt6 and has a few points about how they should proceed. To not hold up this developer hopefully we can provide a specific response to these points. See the following comment:

> <https://github.com/commontk/CTK/issues/947#issuecomment-1301531381>
>
> I've tried to build CTK with Qt 6.0.0, but already the cmake configuration fails…. I've tried to add support for Qt 6 but it turns out there is quite some logic in place to have wrapper macros for calling moc, uic and other tools. Generally Qt 6 should have pretty good cmake support if a very recent cmake is used. But the current implementation of the cmake build scripts is too complex for me to extend it for Qt 6.
> 
> Help would be appreciated!
> 
> \### Notes
> 
> \_This section was appended to the original issue description by @jcfr\_
> 
> \* \[\] Instead of adding \`qt6\_generate\_mocs\` to \[ctkMacroGenerateMocs\](https://github.com/commontk/CTK/blob/master/CMake/ctkMacroGenerateMocs.cmake) (based on \`qt5\_generate\_mocs\`), leverage \[CMake AUTOMOC\](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/manual/cmake-qt.7.html#automoc) feature. See https://github.com/commontk/CTK/pull/1007#discussion\_r743404846