# 2026.03.17 Weekly Meeting
**URL:** https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2026-03-17-weekly-meeting/46468
**Category:** Weekly meetings
**Created:** [March 16, 2026, 6:02pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2026-03-17-weekly-meeting/46468 "2026-03-16T18:02:07Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Sam\_Horvath](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/Sam_Horvath)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2026, 6:02pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2026-03-17-weekly-meeting/46468/1 "2026-03-16T18:02:07Z")
Tomorrow, we will be having our next weekly hangout at **10:00 AM ET until 11:00 AM ET.**
Anyone is welcome to join at this link: [https://bit.ly/slicer-googlemeet-hosted-by-kitware](https://bit.ly/slicer-googlemeet-hosted-by-kitware)
* * *
**Agenda:**
Please post to this thread to put a topic on the agenda! We will try to prioritize agenda items during the meeting.
* * *
Thanks
Sam and Ebrahim
---
### Author:  [@Sam\_Horvath](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/Sam_Horvath)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2026, 6:04pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2026-03-17-weekly-meeting/46468/2 "2026-03-16T18:04:20Z")
CMake (and possible VTK/Paraview as well) is looking to add a policy for AI-assisted contributions:
> **[Verifying connection...](https://gitlab.kitware.com/craig.scott/cmake/-/compare/master...ai-policy?from_project_id=541)**
I wanted to discuss whether this policy would also work for Slicer
---
### Author:  [@jamesobutler](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/jamesobutler)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 12:02am UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2026-03-17-weekly-meeting/46468/3 "2026-03-17T00:02:19Z")
I would like to discuss continued to-do items for Qt6 build support including:
>
>
> @jcfr since this repo depends on https://github.com/jcfr/qt-static-build
> \- \[\] …Should we add a Qt 5.15 build for Windows to complete static builds across Linux/macOS/Windows?
> \- \[\] Would you be able to create a Qt6 static build?
> \- \[\] Should the qt-static-build repo be moved into the CTK GitHub organization for closer maintenance to ctkAppLauncher if it is the only repo using it?
---
### Author:  [@mau\_igna\_06](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/mau_igna_06)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 12:37pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2026-03-17-weekly-meeting/46468/4 "2026-03-17T12:37:29Z")
Hi,
This is happening on Slicer stable 5.10.0
---
### Author:  [@Sam\_Horvath](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/Sam_Horvath)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2026, 3:40pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/2026-03-17-weekly-meeting/46468/5 "2026-03-17T15:40:15Z")
> **[03-17-2026 Meeting Notes - HackMD](https://hackmd.io/@ChBPFan4QJmUqiwaFUA4VQ/HyYYDyv9be)**
>
> Sam was able to read Jc and get things fixed!
# Extension Index down (Sam/JC)
Sam was able to reach Jc and get things fixed! (Maybe. Might have been a netlify glich)
- [Extension server is down - #8 by Sam\_Horvath](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/extension-server-is-down/46478/8)
- Need to improve the netlify setup for Slicer
# Alternative methods for hosting telemetry (Steve/Bernardo)
- Steve is using github repo to host data about user activty for SlicerMorphoDepot (or to handle issues globally instead of per repo of SlicerMorph organization)
- Similar pattern could be used for central telemetry repository
# Bernardo working on new project
- Slicer related work!
# Discussion of netlify and hosted databases (Andras)
# AI policy (Sam)
[CMake Policy in Progress](https://gitlab.kitware.com/craig.scott/cmake/-/compare/master...ai-policy?from_project_id=541)
- Should AI be allowed to be co-authors?
- We have been allowing this so far
- We don’t want authorship, but perhaps attribution
# Multi-place markups (Mauro)
- Discussed implementation and clipping/capping
- Limited number of cuts currently possible with PlaneCut tool of DynamicModeler without capping fails
# Qt6 Applauncher (James)
- [Add qt6 support by lassoan · Pull Request #181 · commontk/AppLauncher · GitHub](https://github.com/commontk/AppLauncher/pull/181#issuecomment-4015335810)
- Need to discuss with JC