# Bad performance when segmenting 11GB micro-CT

**URL:** <https://discourse.slicer.org/t/bad-performance-when-segmenting-11gb-micro-ct/38362>\
**Category:** Support\
**Tags:** segmentation\
**Created:** [September 13, 2024, 4:55am UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/bad-performance-when-segmenting-11gb-micro-ct/38362 "2024-09-13T04:55:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pieper](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.slicer.org/pieper/32/8_2.png) [@pieper](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/pieper)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2024, 5:30pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/bad-performance-when-segmenting-11gb-micro-ct/38362/8 "2024-09-14T17:30:08Z")

</div>

> [@lassoan](#):
>
> What do you think about making surfacenets the default (maybe after releasing Slicer-5.8)?

Yes, I think this is a good idea.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/bad-performance-when-segmenting-11gb-micro-ct/38362)._