# Extension review request : should it be made widely available?

**URL:** <https://discourse.slicer.org/t/extension-review-request-should-it-be-made-widely-available/23941>\
**Category:** Development\
**Created:** [June 19, 2022, 11:25am UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/extension-review-request-should-it-be-made-widely-available/23941 "2022-06-19T11:25:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![chir.set](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.slicer.org/chir.set/32/66982_2.png) [@chir.set](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/chir.set)\
**Post date:** [June 19, 2022, 3:13pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/extension-review-request-should-it-be-made-widely-available/23941/4 "2022-06-19T15:13:10Z")

</div>

> [@lassoan](#):
>
> Markups module or Dynamic modeller module. If it is mainly for quantification

Well it does not have any goal yet ! All this sprung from the [post](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/draw-specific-dimension/22934) I mentioned above. I thought about inclusion in the SandBox extension, and honestly, don’t know how useful it can be.

> [@lassoan](#):
>
> It would mean less code to maintain

Here, I find it much easier to maintain in separate objects. Once an object is being edited, reasoning is focused and constrained. A single markup managing multiple shapes implies a lot of conditionals and it’s easy to get lost in the mind this way. Moreover, reading the code becomes more complex, at least to me.

> [@mau\_igna\_06](#):
>
> You may combine your efforts with @rbumm about the labels

Please refer me to prior work about labels in this case. @rbumm

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/extension-review-request-should-it-be-made-widely-available/23941)._