# Off line volumetric reconstruction/rendering from ultrasound images
**URL:** https://discourse.slicer.org/t/off-line-volumetric-reconstruction-rendering-from-ultrasound-images/35564
**Category:** Support
**Tags:** ultrasound
**Created:** [April 17, 2024, 4:48pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/off-line-volumetric-reconstruction-rendering-from-ultrasound-images/35564 "2024-04-17T16:48:35Z")
**Posts on this page:** 6
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@Caterina](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/Caterina)
#### Post date: [April 17, 2024, 4:48pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/off-line-volumetric-reconstruction-rendering-from-ultrasound-images/35564/1 "2024-04-17T16:48:35Z")
Dear support,
is it possible to perform offline 3d reconstruction of rendering from ultrasound images?
Thanks
---
### Author:  [@Nethrav22](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/Nethrav22)
#### Post date: [April 18, 2024, 1:46am UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/off-line-volumetric-reconstruction-rendering-from-ultrasound-images/35564/2 "2024-04-18T01:46:11Z")
You can use the Slicer IGT volume reconstruction module with recorded sequence data to perform offline reconstruction.
---
### Author:  [@Caterina](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/Caterina)
#### Post date: [May 12, 2024, 8:14pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/off-line-volumetric-reconstruction-rendering-from-ultrasound-images/35564/3 "2024-05-12T20:14:32Z")
I installed SlicerIGT, SlicerAIGT and SlicerIGSIO. These modules resulted installed but they are not present in module finder. In addition, I’m having trouble segmenting a region from ultrasound images GE Vivid E95 in 3D Slicer. I have already read the previous post: [Issue With 3D TEE from GE Vivid E95 in 3D Slicer](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/issue-with-3d-tee-from-ge-vivid-e95-in-3d-slicer/13642). More specifically, considering only the scalar volume file (see screen)
, I cropped the interested region but it is static. If I considered the crop volume sequence module, the input volume sequence, does not recognize the source file as a sequence. The volume rendering option provides this view (see attach
).
The segmentation performed using threshold method is not good (
.
Any suggestion on how to perform a good and time-varying segmentation as the original file?
Thanks
---
### Author:  [@pieper](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/pieper)
#### Post date: [May 12, 2024, 9:56pm UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/off-line-volumetric-reconstruction-rendering-from-ultrasound-images/35564/4 "2024-05-12T21:56:17Z")
> [@Caterina](#):
>
> volume rendering option provides this view
That appears to be a sequence of frames from a cine recording of a rendering made on some other system, not a volumetric dataset. You’ll need to see if you’ve got an actual volume in your study.
---
### Author:  [@Caterina](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/Caterina)
#### Post date: [May 15, 2024, 10:18am UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/off-line-volumetric-reconstruction-rendering-from-ultrasound-images/35564/5 "2024-05-15T10:18:24Z")
Dear @pieper, thanks a lot.
If Slicer produces a volume rendering, the imported file contains information about volume.
Is it correct?
---
### Author:  [@pieper](https://discourse.slicer.org/u/pieper)
#### Post date: [May 15, 2024, 11:44am UTC](https://discourse.slicer.org/t/off-line-volumetric-reconstruction-rendering-from-ultrasound-images/35564/6 "2024-05-15T11:44:53Z")
I’m not sure I follow your question exactly, but generally speaking the data acquisition should include a volume, since it appears from your screenshot that the system made a volume rendering and saved out a movie. If you can load the volume data you should be able to make a similar image in slicer but live, so you can adjust the parameters, like rotation and thresholding.