Wow, this is a significant regression. If the performance improvement is marginal (such as in case of bilateral filter’s 272sec vs 283sec - 5% faster) then probably many people would prefer the old behavior (slightly slower but with consistent progress reporting) for interactive use. I’ve start a discussion on this on the ITK forum (No progress reporting in ITK5 - Engineering - ITK).
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleFilters (BinaryThinningImageFilter) not working in latest MacOS build? | 6 | 622 | February 29, 2020 | |
| Slicer progress from ITK Python filter | 1 | 222 | March 17, 2023 | |
| ITK Filter... reporting broken? | 0 | 195 | November 17, 2021 | |
| Progress reporting in Simple Filters? (9-30 Stable) | 6 | 266 | December 16, 2020 | |
| Error when using filters | 3 | 579 | May 3, 2018 |