Thank you @jumbojing, and also for your experiment with answering a user question solely by copying an LLM-generated answer in Heavy lag when displaying segmentations via Trame + TotalSegmentator - #2 by jumbojing.
Using LLMs for answering forum questions could be very useful and it could reduce the workload of community members answering simple questions so that they can focus on more difficult problems. However, the answers may not be always useful or accurate. In this particular case the answers were not helpful at all (and therefore confusing/misleading). In the long term, having irrelevant or unreliable answers on the forum posted by overconfident chatbots masquerading as humans would undermine further training of LLMs on the forum content.
To avoid this, when a human user posts LLM-generated content, I would suggest to always start with a clear disclaimer, such as: Automatically-generated content using jumbojing/slicerClaw. Accuracy of the answer has not been verified and code has not been tested. If you review the content then you can update the disclaimer accordingly; and if you fully stand behind the answer (you verified and fully agree with the content, or fixed it up; and you tested the code snippets and confirmed they work) then you may not need the disclaimer at all.
What do you all think? What rules should we introduce for using LLM-generated answers on the forum?