If you already know the coordinates of the centroid, go to Markups tool, create a new PointList object and simply type the coordinates or copy/paste the values.
A single point itself is not going to give you measurements. If you create other landmarks on the surface of the brain (by adding to the PointList), you can easily calculate the linear distance between any pair, by highlighting it in the Control Points table and right clicking on them. The units in Slicer are in millimeters (by default). So the reported measurements will also be in millimeters.
Thank you for your response, Steve. I agree I was not very clear. I generated the coordinates of the centroid, however I’m interested in better understanding how these coordinates can be understood in mm. It sounds the only way to understand this is the distance of the centroid relative to other structures (ie, placing points at these structures and measuring the distance between).
If so, what is the best way to place a point at a precise location (e.g. the euryon) on the brain above?
Ah, okay, well if you know the points you want you can just click on them and make markups points. There are tools for pre-populating lists, marking missing points, etc. and tools in SlicerMorph to analyze populations. If you want to get the points from an atlas via a form of registration you can also do that
Euryon is a very poor choice of landmark. First it is a skull landmark (ie., you need the skull to measure it), and is defined as the pair of points that gives you the largest diameter of the skull. If you are using a caliper and working with an actual skull sitting on a table, you can empirically get the diameter fairly consistently doing few retakes, but the 3D coordinates of the L/R euryon can vary at cm scale. So be warned.
If you are insistent on using it, what you need is to use the line tool and draw a bunch of lines and take the one that gives you the largest mediolateral diameter. Then you can look at the coodinates of the two control points as your left and right euryon.
Doing this ‘virtually’ in 3D data is more challenging than doing physically, as the measurement will be susceptible to the orientation of the data. That’s why I believe neuroimaging folks defined a bunch of brain specific coordinate system, including stereotaxic ones so that measurements are consistent. For that you will have to register your data to one of those atlases and then transfer the points.
To repeat, there is nothing to be understood from individual coordinates; they are just points in space. You can either do a multi-dimensional geometric (shape) analysis that directly uses the coordinates themselves or you can convert the coordinates to distances and use the distances to understand the shape of the brain. There are many papers that covers both approaches.