Does anybody have experience in the Aruco tracker?
I have tried to use the Aruco tracker by following this link.
I generate the tracker successfully, but the moving range is very limited and it cannot move close to my model.
Did anyone face a similar problem before? If yes, would you mind telling me that how to fix this problem?
Thank you.
Since I am using the iPad to be the webcam, is it able to solve this issue by using NDI product for tracking?
Thank you
what about depth Camera（binocular camera）?
Since I have changed to use MacBook webcam and smaller size aruco tracker, moving range seems better, but I still need to move very close to the camera which is not useful for real applications.
Does this problem occur to the view angle of the camera? If I need to buy a new webcam, which is view angle of camera that you would like to suggest to buy?
Thank you
hello.
We do have worked with aruco markers , in neuro navigation.
To get some precision with them, first your image must be good enough. a common web cam , also a the Logitech Brio 4k is not good
We choose to use a Sony a 6300 no-mirror camera. it has a resolution of 4k. but it takes some time on the loop. The resolution was dawngrade to 2 k (1920 x 1080)
The image quality, with good ilumination was excelent and the library works fine with these images.
We had to use filters: low-pass, butterworth, or kalman to cutt off higher frecuencies (noise) to retain that movement was significant to locate an object
but there was a problem with the rotation vectors that the library gives. it has some-inherent-noise and error to give the proper results
