Slicer version: 5.1.0-2022-06-01 r30987 / 177f3b3
Hi,
currently I’m trying to get familiar with the new great features of “MALPACA” of the SlicerMorph module.
I followed the steps according to the Appendix given in the manuscript:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278035
MALPACA works fine using the downloaded sample data (mice & apes).
Also the quality control pipeline using slicerMorphR worked out as described in the Appendix (IV. Landmarking Quality Control Pipeline)
Next I tried MALPACA with my data.
In a final step, the QC pipeline was also tested with the new data in R.
Unfortunately the data could not be loaded in R, resulting in the following error message in R:
Error in file(file, “rt”) : cannot open the connection
In addition: Warning message:
In file(file, “rt”) :
cannot open file ‘…/output_target_landmarks/individualEstimates/NA’: No such file or directory
Next I have compared the *.fcsv files of the example data with my data.
- in the example *.fcsv file: the “relation” is given as “associatedNodeID” “template - subject”
columns = id,x,y,z,ow,ox,oy,oz,vis,sel,lock,label,desc,associatedNodeID
vtkMRMLMarkupsFiducialNode_0,-72.8187,-127.5815,50.494,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,USNM084655_LM1-1,
I guess this information is needed to relate the resulting median & the individual landmarks in order to perform the post hoc QC.
- this kind of description is missing in the data which was generated using MALPACA with my own data
columns = id,x,y,z,ow,ox,oy,oz,vis,sel,lock,label,desc,associatedNodeID
1,-7.591875076293945,-4.460249423980713,26.58815574645996,0,0,0,1,1,1,0,1 , , , 2,0
Could this be the reason why SlicerMorphR causes an error when trying to perform the post-hoc QC?
That an “meaningful” description of the “associatedNodeID” is required?
Thanks!
Best,
Markus