This is surface registration which I could not get it to register well. Please notice the transparent model that did not superimpose well.
This is a registered post defect model with CMF fiducial registration which I believe, works better than ROI. Do I have to see transparent gray for pre defect model?
Dr. P, yes I manually approximated before I segmented both images then created STL for surface registration, in this case, I used fiducial registration.
Even Prof. Lassoan stated that I should use surface registration but somehow surface registration is not giving me a good result. Also, I even clipped to make the two models more even at the borders(distal to molars and mesial to anteriors)
Hi Manjula, I will try general registration using DICOM files. your recommended video clip does not have voice recorded so it is kind of hard for me to follow. Also, should I use slicer CMF for general registration or just slicer?
Can you also explain to me what cloud compare is?
Many thanks,
If anyone is willing to try with dicom files to evaluate whether my work step was OK or not, please let me know, I can transfer them via google drive link. Since I sent my stls and my registered and clipped model and model to model is simply plugging your models in order to generate vtk file for SPV, I do not know what I’m doing wrong. Only the periodontal defect is the change and that should be colored based on the depth and allocated color in the color bar not the rest of the mandible (teeth can move bc it is dry mandible but not as much as defect sizes up to 9mm).
